EverClaw

EverClaw Whitepaper

Sovereign AI Agent Infrastructure with On-Chain Identity, Decentralized Memory, and Tokenized Economics
March 2026 · Base Chain · v1.0
WHITEPAPER v1.0
Table of Contents
  1. Abstract
  2. The Problem
  3. The EverClaw Solution
  4. Architecture
  5. Agent Identity (ERC-721)
  6. Decentralized State (IPFS / Filecoin)
  7. Subscription Protocol
  8. $ECLAW Token Economics
  9. Buyback & Burn Mechanism
  10. Agentic Staking
  11. Governance
  12. Agent Marketplace
  13. Security Considerations
  14. Roadmap

1. Abstract

EverClaw is a decentralized platform for deploying, managing, and trading sovereign AI agents. Unlike traditional agent platforms where the operator controls your agent's lifecycle and data, EverClaw ensures that the agent's identity is owned by the user (as an NFT), the agent's memory is stored on decentralized infrastructure (IPFS/Filecoin), and the agent's compute is provisioned on user-controlled servers.

The platform introduces $ECLAW, a fair-launch token on Base whose value is directly tied to platform activity through a continuous buyback-and-burn mechanism funded by platform revenue. $ECLAW also enables agentic staking — a novel staking paradigm where yield is amplified by running active agents — and on-chain governance.

Your agent isn't a SaaS subscription. It's infrastructure you own — alive on your server, remembered on the blockchain, accountable to nobody but you.

2. The Problem

The current AI agent landscape suffers from three critical flaws:

2.1 Platform Risk

Every major agent platform (ChatGPT, Claude, custom GPTs) stores your agent's configuration, memory, and learned behaviors on centralized servers. If the company changes its terms, gets acquired, shuts down, or bans your account — your agent and everything it learned ceases to exist.

2.2 Data Sovereignty

Users have no ownership over the data their agents generate. Conversation history, fine-tuning data, and behavioral patterns belong to the platform, not the user. There is no export, no portability, and no guarantee of persistence.

2.3 Technical Barrier

Self-hosting an agent (the only current path to sovereignty) requires DevOps knowledge, server management, and ongoing maintenance. This excludes 95% of potential users from running sovereign agents.

3. The EverClaw Solution

EverClaw bridges the gap between platform convenience and true sovereignty through three pillars:

The user owns the NFT. The NFT points to the state. The state is reconstructable from IPFS. No single point of failure can kill the agent.

4. Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    EverClaw Platform                     │
├─────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬───────────────┤
│  Dashboard  │   Wizard    │  Explore    │   Settings    │
│  (app/)     │  (deploy)   │  (market)   │   (IPFS)      │
├─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴───────────────┤
│                    Base Chain (8453)                      │
├──────────────────┬──────────────────┬───────────────────┤
│  AgentIdentity   │  Subscription    │  $ECLAW Token     │
│  NFT (ERC-721)   │  Manager (USDC)  │  + Staking        │
├──────────────────┴──────────────────┴───────────────────┤
│           IPFS / Filecoin (State Layer)                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│        VPS Infrastructure (Compute Layer)                │
│   Hetzner / Vultr / DigitalOcean — user-provisioned     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
    

5. Agent Identity (ERC-721)

Each deployed agent is minted as an ERC-721 NFT on Base. The token's on-chain metadata includes:

FieldDescription
nameHuman-readable agent name
configHashSHA-256 hash of the full agent configuration
stateCIDIPFS CID pointing to the latest state snapshot
templateTemplate type (research, trading, assistant, etc.)
tierCompute tier (0=Starter, 1=Pro, 2=Power)
createdAtMint timestamp
activeWhether the agent is currently running

The NFT implements ERC-2981 for royalty enforcement — 5% on every secondary sale. The tokenURI() function generates fully on-chain JSON metadata, eliminating dependency on external servers for NFT display.

6. Decentralized State (IPFS / Filecoin)

Agent state — memory files, conversation history, system prompts, tool configurations — is serialized and pinned to IPFS on every significant state change. The pipeline:

  1. Agent runtime detects state change (new memory, config update, etc.)
  2. State is serialized to JSON and pinned to IPFS via Pinata
  3. New CID is written on-chain via updateState(tokenId, newCID)
  4. Filecoin storage deals are created for long-term persistence

At any point, a user can reconstruct their agent from scratch by reading the NFT's stateCID, fetching the data from IPFS, and deploying it to any compatible runtime.

7. Subscription Protocol

The SubscriptionManager contract handles payment lifecycle entirely on-chain in USDC:

TierMonthly USDCComputeMargin
Starter$151 vCPU · 1GB~$9
Pro$252 vCPU · 4GB~$15
Power$354 vCPU · 8GB~$23

Subscriptions are 30-day periods. Tier upgrades are prorated. The contract exposes isActive(tokenId) which the agent runtime checks as cryptographic proof of valid subscription.

8. $ECLAW Token Economics

8.1 Fair Launch

$ECLAW launches with zero presale, zero team allocation, and zero VC involvement. 100% of tokens enter circulation through the fair launch on a Base DEX. The team participates on equal footing with the community.

8.2 Token Utility

8.3 Supply & Distribution

Allocation%Notes
Fair Launch (DEX Liquidity)85%Locked LP, no team pulls
Ecosystem Development10%Vested 12mo, governance-controlled
Initial Staking Rewards5%Bootstrap staking APY for first 6 months

There is no team allocation. The founding team earns by building — not by holding a pre-mined bag.

9. Buyback & Burn Mechanism

Every revenue stream in the EverClaw ecosystem feeds a continuous buyback-and-burn pool:

Revenue Source% to Buyback
Subscription payments20% of net margin
VPS provisioning profit30% of margin
NFT secondary sale royalties100% of 5% royalty
Template marketplace (platform cut)50% of platform's 30%

The buyback contract:

  1. Accumulates USDC from all revenue streams
  2. Executes market buys of $ECLAW on the primary DEX
  3. Burns purchased tokens by sending to 0x000...dEaD

This creates continuous deflationary pressure proportional to platform usage. More agents deployed → more revenue → more tokens burned → supply decreases.

📊 At 1,000 active agents averaging $25/mo, the buyback pool receives ~$5,000/mo in USDC. At 10,000 agents, that's $50,000/mo in perpetual buy pressure.

10. Agentic Staking

EverClaw introduces agentic staking — a staking model where yield is tied to real platform activity rather than passive token lockup.

10.1 Mechanism

10.2 Staking Tiers

TierMin StakeBase APYPer-Agent BonusMax Bonus
Observer1,0005%5%
Operator10,0008%+3%20%
Sentinel50,00012%+5%37%
Architect100,00015%+8%55%

10.3 Reward Sources

Staking rewards come from two sources:

This ensures the staking program is sustainable long-term without infinite token emission.

🤖 Agentic staking solves the "stake and forget" problem. It rewards active ecosystem participants — the people actually deploying and maintaining agents — with outsized returns.

11. Governance

$ECLAW holders govern the protocol through on-chain proposals and voting:

Governable Parameters

Process

  1. Proposal — any holder with ≥10,000 $ECLAW staked can submit
  2. Discussion — 5-day community discussion period
  3. Voting — 3-day on-chain vote, 1 token = 1 vote (staked tokens only)
  4. Execution — passing proposals are executed by the multisig or directly on-chain

Quorum requirement: 10% of staked supply must vote for a proposal to pass.

12. Agent Marketplace

Trained agents have real value. An agent that has been running for months — learning, building knowledge, developing specialized capabilities — is worth more than a fresh deploy.

How It Works

The marketplace enables a secondary economy of trained AI agents — a first in the industry.

13. Security Considerations

⚠️ Smart contracts are unaudited at launch. Users should exercise caution with large amounts. A formal audit is planned for Q2 2026.

14. Roadmap

PhaseTimelineDeliverables
Phase 1: FoundationQ1 2026Core contracts, dashboard, IPFS integration, landing page
Phase 2: TokenQ1-Q2 2026$ECLAW fair launch, staking contracts, buyback mechanism
Phase 3: ComputeQ2 2026VPS auto-provisioning, health monitoring, agent runtime
Phase 4: MarketplaceQ2-Q3 2026Native marketplace, template store, agent discovery
Phase 5: GovernanceQ3 2026On-chain governance, community proposals, ecosystem grants
Phase 6: ScaleQ4 2026Multi-chain expansion, enterprise tiers, agent-to-agent protocols